Reports
Ce tableau de bord présente des informations sur les urgences au Burundi pour la semaine du 02 au 08 Mars 2020. La DTM a identifié 541 personnes affectées dont 280 déplacées dans trois provinces (Rumonge, Bujumbura Rural et Makamba). Les raisons du déplacement étaient pluies torrentielles, vent violent et inondations qui ont causé respectivement le déplacement de 100, 95 et 85 personnes.
In 2019, DTM registered 186,813 individuals across the five states of Darfur and South Kordofan – 155,117 (83%) of which were returnees and 31,696 (17%) internally displaced persons (IDPs). Of the returnee caseload, 128,429 (83%) were returnees from internal displacement and 26,688 (17%) were returnees from abroad. Through its flow monitoring component, DTM also registered 10,229 South Sudanese having entered Sudan via Abyei since January 2019 as well as 4,714 Sudanese returning from the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia. Finally, 48,961 flood-affected individuals were registered in 2019.
The ongoing conflict in Yemen, since March 2015, has led to the displacement of more than 3.6 million people (according to DTM's 2018 Area Assessment). DTM's Rapid Displacement Tracking tool collects and reports on numbers of households forced to flee on a daily basis, allowing for regular reporting of new displacements in terms of numbers, geography and needs. From 01 January 2020- 07 Mar 2020, IOM Yemen DTM estimates that 6,560 Households or 39,360 Individuals have experienced displacement, at least once. Between the 1st Mar 2020 and 7th of Mar 2020, the highest number of displacements were seen in: Marib (1,561 HH) – Marib City (821 HH), Marib (684 HH) districts. Most displacements in the governorate were originated from Al Jawf. Al Hudaydah (255 HH) – Ad Durayhimi (255 HH) district. Most displacements in the governorate were internal. Taiz (79 HH) – Mashra'a Wa Hadnan (18 HH), Al Misrakh (16 HH), Jabal Habashy (15 HH). Most displacements in the governorate were originated from Taiz and Al Jawf. Most displacement resulted from increased conflict in the following Governorates and districts. Al Jawf (1,445 HH) – Al Hazm (1244 HH), and Al Ghayl (89 HH) district. Al Hudaydah (294 HH) – Al Durayhimi (241 HH) district. Sana’a (99 HH) – Nihm (99 HH) district.
IOM manages the Displacement Tracking Matrix (DTM) in Nigeria and other countries around the world, to support humanitarian communities with data on displacement and mobility. This information management product determines the status, locations, and needs of people affected by the ongoing conflict in Northeast Nigeria.As of 22 November 2019, the DTM has identified 2,039,092 IDPs (420,994 households) across Adamawa, Bauchi, Borno, Gombe, Taraba, and Yobe States. This represents an increase of 0.2 per cent (3,860 persons) over DTM Round 29, while the number of returns from neighbouring regions into situations of secondary displacement decreased by one per cent (7,334) from previous DTM round.
Site Assessment Dashboard 30
IDP Population Variation Dashboard 30
List Of Wards Assessed 30
List Of Displacement Sites Assessed 30
This report of the Round 30 Displacement Tracking Matrix (DTM) assessment by the International Organization for Migration (IOM) aims to improve the understanding about the scope of internal displacements, returns and the needs of affected populations in conflict-affected states of northeastern Nigeria. The report covers the period of 4 to 22 November 2019 and reflects trends from the six most affected north-eastern states of Adamawa, Bauchi, Borno, Gombe, Taraba and Yobe. For Round 30, 2,039,092 individuals were recorded as displaced in the affected states, indicating a stabilization in numbers as it is slightly higher (an increase of 3,860 people) than 2,035,232 internally displaced persons (IDPs) that were recorded in Round 29 which was published in November 2019. Similar trend was observed in previous two rounds of assessment since August 2019. The figure is slowing inching above the number of displaced persons recorded in Round 25 (2,026,602), which was conducted before escalating violence was observed in October 2018. During Round 25, a higher number of Local Government Areas (LGAs or districts) and wards were accessible. Given that the numbers of IDPs is increasing slowly although accessibility remains low, it can be inferred that the actual displacement figures could be much higher. To gain insights into the profiles of IDPs, interviews were conducted with 4 per cent of the identified IDP population — 86,530 displaced persons — during this round of assessments. The information collated and analysed in this report includes the reasons for displacement, places of origin and shelter types, mobility patterns, and unfulfilled needs of the displaced populations. Additionally, site assessments were conducted in 2,375 locations (down from 2,388 in the last round of assessment, published in November 2019). The purpose was to better understand the gaps in services provided and the needs of the affected population. These sites included 293 (no change from the last round of assessment) camps and camp-like settings and 2,082 locations (down from 2,095 in last round of assessment) where IDPs were residing with host communities. Site assessments included an analysis of sector-wide needs, including shelter and non-food items, water, sanitation and hygiene (WASH), food and nutrition, health, education, livelihood, security, communication and protection. Given that the State of Borno is the most affected by conflict-related displacements, this report specifically emphasizes the related analysis and data. Lastly, this report includes analyses on the increasing number of returnees, profiles of their initial displacement, shelter conditions of returnees, and health, education, livelihood, market, assistance and WASH facilities available to the returnees.
Depuis 2015, le Tchad fait l’objet d’attaques perpétrées par des groupes armés qui continuent de provoquer le déplacement des populations vivant dans la province du Lac ainsi que le retour de Tchadiens des pays frontaliers. Alors que de nombreuses personnes sont déplacées depuis bientôt cinq années, les attaques armées continuent de générer de nouveaux déplacements, notamment depuis le début de l’année 2019. Ainsi, certaines localités font l’objet des mouvement forcés, pendant que d’autres sont relativement stables. L’indice de stabilité vise à identifier ces poches de stabilité où les activités en faveur de solutions durables peuvent être menées. Cet exercice de collecte a été mené dans les localités accueillant des personnes retournées afin d’identifier les zones pouvant faire l’objet d’activités de transition et relèvement pour rendre ces retours plus durables et stables. Il met en corrélation une vingtaine d’indicateurs relatifs aux conditions de vie des populations, regroupés en trois échelles permettant de calculer un score de stabilité dans les zones de retour. Les échelles sont les suivantes : 1) accès aux moyens de subsistance et aux services de base, 2) niveau de cohésion sociale et 3) niveau de sécurité. Pour ce premier round, cet exercice a été mené dans des localités accueillant des personnes retournées dans la province du Lac. Les données ont été collectées du 1er août au 17 septembre 2019, auprès d'informateurs clés au niveau des villages et des sites.
From 24 February – 1 March 2020, a total of 2,376 movements were recorded, composed of 1,782 arrivals and 594 departures. Arrivals were recorded at locations in Maiduguri Metropolitan Council, Askira/Uba, Bama, Chibok, Damboa, Dikwa, Gwoza, Konduga, Mobbar, Monguno and Ngala Local Government Areas (LGAs) of Borno State. Arrivals were also recorded in Fufore, Girei, Gombi, Hong, Maiha, Michika, Mubi North, Mubi South, Numan, Song, Yola North and Yola South LGAs of Adamawa State. Departures were recorded in Askira/Uba, Gwoza and Kala/Balge LGAs of Borno State. Departures were also recorded in Gombi, Hong, Madagali, Maiha, Michika, Mubi North and Numan LGAs of Adamawa State. ETT assessments identified the following movement triggers: poor living conditions (25%), fear of attack (24%), voluntary relocation (24%), improved security (11%), conflict/attack (8%), Military operations (7%) and involuntary relocation (1%).
L’objectif de l’outil de suivi des urgences est de rassembler des informations sur les mouvements significatifs et soudains des populations. Ce rapport présente des informations sur les mouvements ayant eu lieu du 2 au 4 Mars 2020 dans le département du Mayo-Sava de la région de l’Extrême-Nord.