Reports

In response to the COVID-19 pandemic, the Government of Sudan (GoS) declared a nationwide health emergency and introduced mitigation measures in March 2020 to reduce the transmission of the virus. These measures include restrictions on travel due to closure of airports, points of entry (POE) along land borders and maritime boundaries, as well as domestic movement restrictions. 

On 25 April 2020, South Sudan registered its sixth COVID-19 case just two days after the fifth. On confirmation of the sixth case, the High-Level Task Force (HLTF) on 26 April 2020 issued a suspension of all public transportation from and to Juba as well as Torit, where cases of the virus were found. These road movement restrictions follow interstate flight limitations from 13 April 2020. As of 21 April, the HLTF further extended all movement restrictions introduced in March 2020 until further notice.  Humanitarian access was limited by newly imposed flight clearance taxations and mandatory “COVID-19 free” certificates prior to travel. This impacted food air drops as well as trucking for pre-positioning of humanitarian goods during these final weeks of the dry season. As of 25 April 2020, humanitarian workers can return to their home-country without such a certificate.  Further  COVID-19 related population movements included increased permanent exits from Wau PoC AA (observed by IOM DTM) and reportedly return movements from Uganda and in-country locations to Juba according to the RRC.  Although cargo is mostly allowed to enter the country, movement restrictions have caused market prices like those of wheat, sorghum and maize to increase.   Further arrests were made of persons breaking congregation or travel restrictions. 

The ongoing conflict in Yemen, since March 2015, has led to the displacement of more than 3.6 million people (according to DTM's 2018 Area Assessment). DTM's Rapid Displacement Tracking tool collects and reports on numbers of households forced to flee on a daily basis, allowing for regular reporting of new displacements in terms of numbers, geography and needs.   From 01 January 2020- 2 May 2020, IOM Yemen DTM estimates that 12,886  Households or 77,316 Individuals have experienced displacement, at least once.                                                                                                  Between the 26th Apr 2020 and 2nd of May 2020, the highest number of displacements were seen in:                                                                 ·       Marib (104 HH) – Marib City (50 HH), Marib (43 HH) districts. Most displacements in the governorate were originated from Al Jawf and Marib. ·       Al Dhale'e (92 HH) – Ad Dhale'e (46 HH), Qa'atabah (27 HH), Al Husha (9 HH) districts. Most displacements in the governorate were internal. ·       Al Hudaydah (45 HH) – Al Khawkhah (40 HH), At Tuhayat (5 HH) districts. Most displacements in the governorate were internal. Most displacement resulted from increased conflict in the following Governorates and districts.  ·       Al Dhale'e (80 HH) – Qa'atabah (38 HH), Al Husha (30 HH), Ad Dhale'e (12 HH) districts. ·       Al Jawf (72 HH) – Khabb wa ash Sha'af (46 HH), Al Hazm (19 HH) districts.                                                  ·       Al Hudaydah (58 HH) – Al Hali (13 HH), Hays (12 HH), At Tuhayat (9 HH) districts.                               Methods used: ·       DTM’s Rapid Displacement Tracking (RDT) tool collects and reports on numbers of households forced to flee on a daily basis, allowing for regular reporting of new displacements in terms of numbers, geography and needs. Limitations: ·       DTM Yemen is unable to report on figures in some governorates due to access limitations.

In response to the COVID-19 pandemic, the local authorities of Yemen (Ye) declared a nationwide health emergency and introduced many preventive and mitigation measures adopted by the rest of the world starting in March 2020 in order to avoid and reduce the transmission of the COVID-19. These measures include the adoption of restrictions on movement countrywide, by closure/partially closure of (4) International airports, (11) sea border points, (2) land border points and including restrictions on freedom of movement between south and north governorates at various point (7 recorded in this report), including in Taizz and Al Bayda.​ ​

During the period of 20 - 26 April 2020, a total of 1,110 movements were recorded, composed of 732 arrivals and 378 departures. Arrivals were in recorded at locations in Askira/Uba, Bama, Gwoza and Mobbar Local Government Areas (LGAs) of Borno State. Arrivals were also recorded in Demsa, Fufore, Girei, Gombi, Hong, Michika, Mubi North, Mubi South, Numan, Song, Yola North and Yola South LGAs of Adamawa State.   Departures were recorded in Kala/Balge LGAs of Borno State; Fufore, Mubi South Girei, Hong, Madagali, Maiha, Michika, Mubi North, Numan, Song, Demsa, Gombi and Yola South LGAs of Adamawa State also recorded departures.    ETT assessments identified the following movement triggers: voluntary relocation (42.4%), improved security (29.4%), poor living condition (27.1%), involuntary relocation (1.1%).

List Of Displacement Sites Assessed 31

List Of Wards Assessed 31

Ce Dashboard présente une mise à jour des principales informations sur la situation du déplacement et de retours dans les territoires de KABALO et MANONO à l’issue du troisième cycle d’évaluation de «suivi de mobilité des populations» conduit par la DTM dans la province de Tanganyika. Les informations de ce rapport ont été collectées du 10 au 28 janvier 2020. L’OIM a pu mener ces évaluations en collaboration avec l’ONG locale AIDES et la Division Provinciale des affaires humanitaires (DIVAH). Lors du 3 e cycle, un total de 1 124 villages a pu être évalué à travers 4 006 informateurs clés dans 4 zones de santé.

In March 2019, Cyclone Idai caused the destruction of housing and infrastructure and that left more than 400,000 people displaced, with 160,927 having immediately sought refuge in over 164 temporary accommodation centres. The cyclone contributed to significant housing damage, particularly in communities with poorly built houses.  The most affected locations were Manica, Sofala, Tete and Zambezia provinces in central Mozambique. Since then, displaced populations have either returned to their places of origin, relocated to new areas or have settled in various resettlement sites which were set up across the central provinces. Working alongside the Shelter Cluster and the Cabinet for Reconstruction (GREPOC), IOM's DTM team collaborated with Mozambique’s National Institute for Disaster Management (INGC) conducted an assessment of the shelter conditions of both displaced and non-displaced families across the four affected provinces, to gain a better understanding of the current housing conditions and the communities’ abilities to self-recover, as well as and the type of shelter and housing support still required to enable affected households to restore their lives. This assessment was designed through a collaboration between DTM and the Shelter Cluster in Mozambique, and based on the guidance outlined in the Post-Cyclone Reconstruction Programme (PALPOC) developed by GREPOC, to guide the reconstruction efforts by partners. This collaboration ensured that the indicators would align with the PALPOC whilst maintaining DTM methodologies.  Findings from this assessment are presented according to settlement types, and include information on geographic location, demographic composition, displacement history, access to building materials, technical knowledge, housing conditions and the needs of both displaced and non-displaced families.

IDP Population Variation Dashboard 31

Ce Dashboard présente des principales informations sur la situation du déplacement et des retours dans le Territoire de Walikale à l’issue du cinquième cycle d’évaluation de « suivi de mobilité des populations » conduit par la DTM dans la province de Nord-Kivu. Il a été réalisé sur base des données collectées sur terrain dans les 4 zones de santé du territoire de WALIKALE, du 7 janvier au 23 février 2020. En collaboration avec l’ONG locale Action et Intervention pour le Développement et I ‘Encadrement Social (AIDES) et la Division Provinciale des affaires humanitaires (DIVAH), un total de 586 villages ont été évalués et 1 852 informateurs clés ont été interviewés). 

Nigeria — Site Assessment Dashboard 31 (February 2020)

Give us your feedback

Image CAPTCHA